AO Dispute

Donations of any size and regularity are always welcome to help offset the costs of maintaining this site.

February 2012

Su	Mo	Tu	We	Th	Fr	Sa
			1	2	3	4
5	6	7	8	9	10	11
12	13	14	15	16	17	18
19	20	21	22	23	24	25
26	27	28	29
______ Holidays ______
Feb 14 - Valentine's Day

[Senna Lusch]

Here's my 2 cents from a slave's point of view ...I'm in agreement with most here, your av is visually moving, you're playing the part of a slave, if a Free is not pleased with your actions they can see they have every right to tell you to stop IC...it's not to stop you from using the AO altogether but while you're in the presence of that Free you should ..afterall you are playing the role of  a slave.  I don't think it's a hit at you OOC, you could say the same for having to be naked...would you tell a Free you won't go naked simply because you like what you're wearing?

[Farloc Genira]

By far the funniest thing I have noticed is finding Nava bending over backwards to be trashy which when I look at it, i see her stretching from kneeling all day and that's why i kept it in the sequence, so that opinion just seems closed minded. If the bending backwards nadu ao sequence was supposed to be erotic than why is it that i have the same bending backwards technique in my tower ao, which btw, if you notice, Nava towers when she serves FW or with a group of FW, Nava nadus when a Master(s) is/are present or just in the presence of other slaves as she finds the position compfortable (i've actually tested out the postions in rl and kneeling with the thighs parted is more compfortable by fair). The idea that Nava bending backwards is trashy has to do with one's own personal hang up, yes Nava is a slut and yes I'd say she's a pleasure slave, but you seeing her bending backwards and stretching as trashy is kinda... strange.

 

[Farloc Genira]

From my perspective, Senna, those are two different things, but that's just how i look at it

[Asea Andel]

You asked for opinions but yet you've argued with every single one given Farloc. They are just opinions.  In my opinion that particular AO is trashy, in nadu or tower.  It doesn't look like a stretch, sorry, but to me it doesn't.  I don't have a some FW hang up, I played a slave once and had that AO, I took that animation out of the sequence because I didn't think it appropriate for that role.

[Farloc Genira]

Well i like to discuss issues and evaluate different sides and perspectives, that's not arguing in my opinion

[Aphris Myoo]

, but the other is that slave AO you use that bends the slave backwards while she is in nadu.  I do not tell anyone what they can or can not wear on there av. Each person has the right to dress there av how they wish. But then others also have the right rather they will role-play with you or not.

I know that pose, you see it very often. And if its a way to get attention from a master, ok. But if you are in a role play situation, and then they use it completely out of context, I some times have the lust of the kicking them in  their so openly exposed heat.

[Farloc Genira]

I still think it's weird that everybody see the pose as erotic and the fact that another woman is offended by seeing a vagina is honestly weird. Yea when I first came to Gor I didn't want to wear camisk with the vagina out or be nude but after awhile the affect wore off. In short, honestly, just get over it or grow up. It's strange I rp as a slut and I'm the only one who don't see the pose in a sexual context, so what does that tell you about the minds of some of the FW. Anyhow, I think this subject is closed, at least I hope cus it's going all off subject.

[Farloc Genira]

Yes that was the initial topic, sorry, I just feel in today's society people see sex in everything which is sad to me, if i felt the pose had sexual overtone I would have not worn it and taken it out as i did with the one where it looks like she masturbate, I've actually knelt on the floor and bent backwards doing the pose in rl, it can be done, all it is is a stretch, nothing sexual and also i watched my av, you can't see her heat no better than when she's not stretching unless you zoom in on it, this pose doesn't present her heat anymore than the other nadu poses so people are obviously seeing what they want to see and not what it really is, a girl stretching backwards, she does the same in tower, nothing sexual at all. To me regular nadu poses aren't even sexual but than again I am a female and not a Master, a woman kneeling with her thighs open just doesn't bother me even when I was a FW.

[Friday Benoir]

Farloc, the thing is, IC kneeling with your legs wide open is SUPPOSE to bother a FW. It's how Norman made them.  OOC, I don't care, not one bit, go ahead, run around completely nude for all I care.  On the AO question,  I think that AO is seen by a majority of people as sexually provocative, even if you do not.  That is why it became so popular for a while. My own opinion on the matter is, wear what you want,  but deal with the IC consequences.  If you find people tell you to stop doing what you are doing, then stop.  I may not want to wear a veil, but if threatened with a collar, i'll slap one on.

[Farloc Genira]

Yes, I know ICly FW are bothered by a girl with her thighs open I was more commenting on people's views ooc. Thank you for your reply.